MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B79
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79) (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210203
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 11:26
Run Duration	316 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 73 1-Core 141 2-Core 281 88% 165 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 804 79% 647 Pts	64-Core 1,061 66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gigabyte(1458 4008) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 153 Reflection 154 Parallax 152 125% 153 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 132 Splatting 118 117% 147 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 106GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2535 Write 2,378 Mixed 1,627 485% 2,180 MB/s	4K Read 65.8 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 88.4 296% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,159 DQ Write 777 DQ Mixed 1,023 748% 986 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 242GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 115 116 116 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 149 Write 167 Mixed 74.9 SusWrite 115 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 349GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 59 60 62 62 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 90.2 Write 87.8 Mixed 62.4 SusWrite 60.6 56% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 340GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 74 76 75 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 54.1 Write 49.4 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 73.1 42% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 57%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 1,393 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 25GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 7.5 14 15 15 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 23 Write 14.9 Mixed 7 SusWrite 12.1 18% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.2 95% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$41 87,344 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.6% Good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 27.2 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 21.4 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 25.4 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 94.7 42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 16: 2R 0G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
16%	13%	60	236	59	60	65"	1280 720	PHL04C3 Philips FTV

History: Score 22: 3R 1G 4B | Score 16: 2R 0G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	124x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	94x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	41x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	22x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	22x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	28x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	34x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	21x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 128% - Outstanding

Total price: $381

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 16: 2R 0G 6B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)