Acer NC-ES1-523-887J

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer NC-ES1-523-887J  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TRICERA_CZL
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 09:52
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Memory 30.2
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 58.3
24% 40 Pts
4-Core 63.6
8-Core 81.2
9% 72.4 Pts
64-Core 86.7
5% 86.7 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 41%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 122 113 116 182 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 421
Write 383
Mixed 388
SusWrite 161
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 20.5
66% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 97.7
DQ Write 81.2
DQ Mixed 88.7
67% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 254
16% 254 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 2 2 64 0" 1280 720
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback