Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 121% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA (all builds)
Memory	14.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 07:23
Run Duration	302 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 64 1-Core 146 2-Core 290 87% 167 Pts	4-Core 577 8-Core 1048 98% 812 Pts	64-Core 2,004 124% 2,004 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% EVGA(3842 3182) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 163 Parallax 164 136% 165 fps	MRender 189 Gravity 151 Splatting 124 123% 155 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,834 Write 2002 Mixed 1,803 421% 1,880 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 67.9 237% 90.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,011 DQ Write 760 DQ Mixed 888 663% 886 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 48GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 268 109 61 63 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 478 Write 436 Mixed 363 SusWrite 162 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 50.2 160% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 199 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 134%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 362GB free Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2006 1728 1696 1700 1236 1286 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	298% Outstanding	Read 1,988 Write 2260 Mixed 1,797 SusWrite 1,609 432% 1,913 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 70.8 249% 92.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1070 DQ Write 875 DQ Mixed 973 728% 973 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 298% Great: 347%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$16 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 118GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 61 60 61 59 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 35.6 Write 29.5 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 59.4 28% 37.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 43%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 357GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 98 99 99 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 110 Write 98.7 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 97.9 71% 96.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 93GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 117 117 117 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 105 Write 101 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 116 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 109%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 1GB 685 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 3.7 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 4.8 9% 8.48 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 4400 C19 Series 24GB 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.8% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 11.9 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 13.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 3R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	25%	53	184	85	144	27"	2560 1440	VSCA738 VX2758-Series

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 2,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	566x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	524x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $15Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	455x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	325x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	267x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	193x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	261x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	185x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	144x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	146x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	62x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,255

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16