Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 155% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 155% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	55.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '21 at 04:46
Run Duration	404 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 72.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 294 93% 174 Pts	4-Core 561 8-Core 921 91% 741 Pts	64-Core 1,386 86% 1,386 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650 20,197 User benchmarks, average bench 171% MSI(1462 3951) ≥ 4GB Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	175% Outstanding	Lighting 221 Reflection 251 Parallax 472 180% 315 fps	MRender 379 Gravity 160 Splatting 273 220% 271 fps
Poor: 165% ↑ This bench: 175% Great: 178%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$37 109,999 User benchmarks, average bench 244% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1106 636 677 648 591 613 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 2,002 Write 2,301 Mixed 1757 SusWrite 712 380% 1,693 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 76.4 263% 98.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,356 DQ Write 1,164 DQ Mixed 1,228 929% 1,250 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 297%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB 11,818 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 896GB free Firmware: STNSC014 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3851 3925 3937 3927 3932 3953 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	473% Outstanding	Read 2,056 Write 2,783 Mixed 2181 SusWrite 3,921 622% 2,735 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 86.6 279% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,536 DQ Write 1,337 DQ Mixed 1,430 1,074% 1,434 MB/s
Poor: 177% ↑ This bench: 473% Great: 492%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 10TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 91GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 107 102 107 109 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 171 Write 150 Mixed 144 SusWrite 105 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 12 4K Mixed 1.3 43% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 5.4 DQ Write 10.9 DQ Mixed 0.8 3% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 34%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 79GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 66 68 67 67 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 124 Write 124 Mixed 62 SusWrite 66.7 69% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 19GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 103 102 102 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 197 Write 114 Mixed 77.7 SusWrite 102 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 53GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 158 158 159 159 160 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 53GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 165 165 153 167 167 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 4x16GB 751 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.1% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 37.8 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 26.6 63% 22 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 136%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 5R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	40%	45	346	287	75	32"	2560 1440	HPN3378 OMEN by HP 32

History: Score 31: 2R 4G 9B | Score 48: 5R 5G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	869x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16