MSI B450 Tomahawk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 Tomahawk  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '21 at 04:08
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.65 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 71.8
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 172
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 664
60% 502 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.9% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 50.4
48% 63.5 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 67
Splatting 61.6
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 243 245 255 241 244 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 452
Mixed 432
SusWrite 246
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 48
156% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 297
244% 348 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 100%
Great: 125%
Sandisk X600 M.2 2280 SATA 256GB
162GB free
Firmware: X6114012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 31 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 97%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
480GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 247 250 259 244 248 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 470
Mixed 452
SusWrite 251
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 53.7
178% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 369
278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
995GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 116 115 116 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 115
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB
32GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 22.9
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 15.4
29% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.5
138% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KM0VW4-MID 3000 C16 Series KM0VW4-MID 3000 C16 Series 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 22
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 2R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 18% 49 109 6 165 29.5" 2560 1080 SPT0BCC Sceptre P30
Typical B450 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 7,293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B450 Tomahawk - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $732
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback