Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 21:25
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 63 1-Core 44.3 2-Core 78.8 40% 62 Pts	4-Core 125 8-Core 87.8 15% 107 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C606) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 960GB 1,660 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 153 191 185 136 187 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.4% Average	Read 171 Write 160 Mixed 163 SusWrite 170 38% 166 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 16.5 51% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 135 114% 165 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 104%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB 50,772 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 2BE10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 102 101 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	60% Good	Read 106 Write 74.7 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 102 64% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 184% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 12.2 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	55x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	39x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	33x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	88x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	58x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	50x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	6x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	4x

RAM
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	22x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 871 samples	15x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16