Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	83.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200922
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 20:36
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 47.5 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 79.5 32% 52.8 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 547 49% 416 Pts	64-Core 533 33% 533 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 12.6 Parallax 22.7 13% 17.3 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 15.3 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 180 185 169 152 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Read 787 Write 208 Mixed 323 SusWrite 174 82% 373 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 25.5 92% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 178 165% 256 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 3,232 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 706GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 70 72 72 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Read 50.7 Write 69 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 68.5 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB 48,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 13 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD0563

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,836x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	979x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,360x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	946x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	508x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,156x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	406x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	587x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	135x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16