Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 20:36
Run Duration	396 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	66%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 117 2-Core 238 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 678 68% 551 Pts	64-Core 1,149 71% 1,149 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.8 Reflection 39.1 Parallax 37.1 30% 37.7 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 39 Splatting 26.1 27% 34 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SA1000M 240GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 262 156 174 175 168 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 426 Write 320 Mixed 191 SusWrite 176 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 15.2 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 9.5 39% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 90%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 918GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 174 175 176 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 171 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 173 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 14,281 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 12.7 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 12 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 11.3 SC Mixed 11.8 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 38: 4R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	34%	29	246	163	60	24"	1920 1080	AUS24A1 VG245

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,012 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	835x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	627x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	295x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	225x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	101x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16