Dell XPS 17 9710

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive419% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 17 9710  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0TXN0W
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 19:45
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 72
1-Core 177
2-Core 340
103% 196 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 646
87% 650 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.9% Outstanding
Lighting 113
Reflection 127
Parallax 119
92% 120 fps
MRender 90.8
Gravity 123
Splatting 108
88% 107 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 101%
Intel UHD Graphics
Dell(1028 0A5D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.83% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 17
Parallax 11.8
8% 12.8 fps
MRender 14.3
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 12.1
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.83%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3058 3117 3273 716 651 651 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
419% Outstanding
Read 2,918
Write 3,309
Mixed 2,983
SusWrite 1911
627% 2,780 MB/s
4K Read 82
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 118
388% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,552
DQ Write 1356
DQ Mixed 1,427
1,077% 1445 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 419%
Great: 442%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
424GB free
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3350 3344 2901 748 754 747 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
437% Outstanding
Read 3117
Write 3,437
Mixed 3,028
SusWrite 1,974
651% 2,889 MB/s
4K Read 84.4
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 120
397% 141 MB/s
DQ Read 1,627
DQ Write 1,448
DQ Mixed 115
476% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 206%
This bench: 437%
Great: 442%
Apple HD D HTS541010A 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JA0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 102
63% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%
Asmt ASM1352R-Safe 2TB
66GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 59 60 59 59 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
44% Average
Read 98.3
Write 69.7
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 54.7
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMAA2GS6CJR8N-XN 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 31.5
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 18.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0F14 SAMSUNG
Typical XPS 17 9710 Builds (Compare 1,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 17 9710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback