Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 18:09
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	63.9% Good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 71.9 2-Core 135 58% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 390 40% 322 Pts	64-Core 416 26% 416 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180 23,273 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Lighting 16.1 Reflection 23 Parallax 15.4 13% 18.2 fps	MRender 24.5 Gravity 17.6 Splatting 16.2 16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 128GB 6,890 User benchmarks, average bench 142% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: V9002s16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 303 252 235 28 183 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 868 Write 506 Mixed 276 SusWrite 223 103% 468 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 72.7 4K Mixed 36.9 135% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 389 DQ Mixed 212 178% 249 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 197%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 235GB free Firmware: 1AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 19 24 17 18 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 81%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB 7,454 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 5678 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 5.9 5.9 5.2 5.8 6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 12 Write 5.2 SusWrite 5.2 8% 7.47 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 8%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101M 1TB 1,107 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 359GB free, PID 0408 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 27 28 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 27.4 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 27.5 37% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 2x8GB 6,401 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.2% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 12: 1R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
12%	13%	31	116	80	60	21.5"	1920 1080	SAN952D LCD MONITOR

History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 12: 1R 2G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	431x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16