PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP xw4600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AA0h |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100208 |
Uptime | 10.7 Days |
Run Date | Jul 24 '21 at 16:37 |
Run Duration | 184 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
43.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 1956) 2GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 12 122 145 69 19 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
554GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 63 73 89 95 91 MB/s
|
51.6%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
|
20.7%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3% | 2% | 40 | 145 | 27 | 60 | 31.5" | 1920 1080 | SAM0CE1 S32E360 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 24x |
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 21x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 18x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 17x |
Quadro FX 1700NvidiaBench 1%, 2,013 samples | 12x |
Quadro FX 580NvidiaBench 2%, 5,936 samples | 11x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $129 |