Asus PRIME H310M-C/PS R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-C/PS R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200714
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$249 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 153 2-Core 304 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 598 8-Core 1,132 103% 865 Pts	64-Core 1,133 70% 1,133 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC7) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Lighting 98.4 Reflection 92.3 Parallax 80.3 80% 90.3 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 81.4 Splatting 74.6 61% 73.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 294GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 695 667 650 648 640 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 673 Write 632 Mixed 626 SusWrite 667 146% 649 MB/s	4K Read 68.8 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 90.9 299% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 841 DQ Write 717 DQ Mixed 1167 768% 908 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 355%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 179GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 441 422 158 133 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 508 Write 419 Mixed 399 SusWrite 279 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 13.1 44% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 48.9 100% 200 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CB8GU2400.C8ET CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.8% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 22.5 81% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 24.4 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	144	23.8"	1280 720	AOC2402 24G2W1G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-C/PS R2.0 Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-C/PS R2.0

CPU
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	59x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	51x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	12x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	21x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	17x
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	14x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	8x
256GB SSD 256GBLexarBench 111%, 12,615 samples	7x
128GB SSD 128GBLexarBench 67%, 8,135 samples	6x

RAM
CL17-17-17 D4-2400 1x16GBGEILBench 41%, 425 samples	10x
CL17-17-17 D4-2400 1x8GBGEILBench 40%, 990 samples	10x
CB16GU2666.C8ET 1x16GBCrucialBench 43%, 792 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $259

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16