PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | PC Vortex 2500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3-CF |
Memory | 60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191128 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 24 '21 at 15:45 |
Run Duration | 225 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.6%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2807 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1616 1695 1633 1421 1452 1292 MB/s
|
310%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
243GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1246 1237 584 586 585 585 MB/s
|
237%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
899GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 193 193 195 189 193 MB/s
|
98.5%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$8
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 18 23 21 29 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples | 1x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples | 1x |
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $1,049 |