Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 14:07
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.5% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 25.6
2-Core 51.3
31% 44.6 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 143
15% 122 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.2% Average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 50.7
50% 56.4 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 54.6
Splatting 48.1
40% 48.2 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN2 500NVMe-M.2/80 500GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 573 255 468 568 598 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,160
Write 1,003
Mixed 820
SusWrite 482
194% 866 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 23.7
110% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 254
189% 250 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 120%
Great: 263%
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
105GB free
Firmware: DXT02L5Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 216 245 245 246 244 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 431
Write 245
Mixed 177
SusWrite 238
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 20.2
77% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 57.6
81% 150 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE BLS8G4D240FSBK.8FBD BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FBD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 20.3
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.5" 1280 720 VSC0F1F VX2835wm
Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,081
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback