Galaxy A320M Ver1.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGalaxy A320M Ver1.0  (all builds)
MotherboardGALAX GALAX A320M DRAGON GENERAL Ver1.0
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '21 at 11:39
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 185
78% 133 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 732
65% 551 Pts
64-Core 960
59% 960 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$279
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 137
Parallax 100
85% 114 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 102
Splatting 89.5
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 86%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS480G2G0B-00EPW0 480GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UK400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 166 52 0.2 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 455
Write 398
Mixed 324
SusWrite 96.4
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 16.8
80% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 34.4
46% 82.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
76GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 117 116 115 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 122
Write 88.9
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 116
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
208GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 76 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43% Average
Read 73
Write 71.9
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 76.5
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 33.9
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 29.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 144 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G4
Typical A320M Ver1.0 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Galaxy A320M Ver1.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $285
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback