PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 7810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 7810 (all builds) |
Memory | 122.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20181213 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 24 '21 at 08:43 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
57.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 40" | 1280 720 | SAM0C39 SAMSUNG |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 142x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 112x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 86x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 135x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 121x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $280Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 78x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 32% - Below average | Total price: $63 |