Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '21 at 21:34
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 204 70% 126 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 692 66% 543 Pts	64-Core 1,046 65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 0517) CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 64 Parallax 93.2 56% 75.3 fps	MRender 66 Gravity 74.3 Splatting 47 50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 264GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1219 828 812 802 633 495 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 2,550 Write 2,233 Mixed 1,574 SusWrite 798 399% 1,789 MB/s	4K Read 59.6 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 80 265% 91.8 MB/s	DQ Read 806 DQ Write 661 DQ Mixed 723 544% 730 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 372%
Asmt 2115 525GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 183GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 249 250 248 251 248 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Read 291 Write 397 Mixed 326 SusWrite 273 73% 322 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 24.5 80% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 119 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 128 94% 123 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 72%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 180 183 178 182 179 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 128 Write 140 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 179 83% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 108%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 769GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 159 158 160 160 160 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 64.2 Write 107 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 159 65% 90 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2 361% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 110%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 149 148 149 148 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 148 Write 148 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 147 84% 116 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: ML6OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 81 79 79 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	48.1% Average	Read 89 Write 92.8 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 78.4 57% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 73%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 23GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 43 43 43 46 46 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 122 Write 52 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 42.9 60% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x16GB 981 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 32.6 97% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.9 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 29.2 84% 29.5 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	75	27"	1280 720	PHLC156 PHL 273V7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	129x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	115x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	96x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	94x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	68x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	32x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	29x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	36x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16