Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M52BC_M32BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141105
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 20:25
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8310
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 96.8
53% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 310
31% 254 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 61
Parallax 83.3
50% 68.6 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 46.9
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 372 84 88 102 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 458
Write 369
Mixed 359
SusWrite 165
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 25.5
108% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 124
109% 162 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
217GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 92 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 89.4
Mixed 100
SusWrite 90.9
72% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.3% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 7R 6G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
63% 23% 102 281 196 60 27" 1920 1080 AUS27AA VG275
History: Score 28: 2R 4G 6B | Score 63: 7R 6G 10B
Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $42
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback