PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M740 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3348-A1 |
Memory | 24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1200x4294967296 szín |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190729 |
Uptime | 7.8 Days |
Run Date | Jul 23 '21 at 17:25 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | HUN-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
71.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 395 379 385 397 395 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
|||
ROG ESD-S1C 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 350 353 361 365 364 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: A840
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 140 139 138 137 139 MB/s
|
77.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB Micron 9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 32GB
2133, 2133, 2667 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192 MB
|
64%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 6 | 60 | 25.6" | 1280 720 | HWP26F9 HP LP2475w |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 22x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 12x |
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 13x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 12x |
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 9% - Terrible | Total price: $440 |