Asrock Z77E-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z77E-ITX (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130712
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '21 at 15:22
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3225-$325 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 31.8 2-Core 57.4 34% 49.9 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 105 14% 103 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Lighting 18.4 Reflection 18.3 Parallax 19.1 15% 18.6 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 19.7 Splatting 17.3 14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 97 109 108 70 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 418 Write 180 Mixed 208 SusWrite 98.2 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 12.8 60% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 28.7 49% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 245GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 62 62 62 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 59.7 Write 62.3 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 61.6 46% 61.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 67%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB 4,330 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 120GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 56 58 59 60 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5403-046.A00LF 2x4GB 445 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 9.9 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77E-ITX Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77E-ITX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	53x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	23x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	6x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	8x
99U5471-050.A00LF 99U5471-040.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 48%, 13 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $223

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16