Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA560
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 05:42
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
88% 153 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 618
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 785
53% 785 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2012) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 115
Parallax 6.8
4% 42.4 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.9
5% 8.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 721 803 569 610 606 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,937
Write 1,862
Mixed 1,598
SusWrite 696
341% 1,523 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 65
219% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1024
DQ Write 818
DQ Mixed 912
685% 918 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 229%
Great: 294%
SHGP31-500GM-2 500GB
188GB free
Firmware: 41060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1586 820 840 815 764 821 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 1,712
Mixed 1,619
SusWrite 941
355% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 73.8
238% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 956
717% 959 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 258%
Great: 358%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
92GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 17 15 0.2 0.3 2.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 125
Write 73.6
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 16.5
87% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 60: 8R 5G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 43% 42 107 5 144 15.5" 1536 864 NCP004B
History: Score 33: 3R 3G 9B | Score 60: 8R 5G 5B
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback