Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 20:33
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42% Average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
63% 118 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 264
27% 220 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 42%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$274
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 96.5
Parallax 102
88% 102 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 82
Splatting 72.6
72% 90.4 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 83 84 77 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 133
Write 101
Mixed 120
SusWrite 78.8
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 15.8
56% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 94.3
78% 112 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
466GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 227 284 291 350 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 318
Write 313
Mixed 308
SusWrite 268
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 24.9
82% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 330
243% 317 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
340GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 228 284 292 350 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 312
Write 302
Mixed 292
SusWrite 268
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 23.6
75% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 324
246% 331 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
407GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 227 285 291 350 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 388
Write 327
Mixed 365
SusWrite 268
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 36
4K Mixed 24.2
76% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 298
233% 321 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
178GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 75 75 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 82.6
Write 77.6
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 74.5
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 5 7 5 165 24" 1280 720 AUS24AC VG248
Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 13,918 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback