Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 550-$110 19,058 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	46.8% Average	Memory 66.4 1-Core 55 2-Core 114 48% 78.5 Pts	4-Core 157 8-Core 171 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 170 10% 170 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36FA) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.74% Terrible	Lighting 2.9 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.43 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.7 4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.74% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,836 Write 1,625 Mixed 1,355 357% 1,605 MB/s	4K Read 83.8 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 56.2 235% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 291 DQ Mixed 368 258% 324 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 254GB free Firmware: 06.01D06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 107 106 109 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 113 Write 102 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 106 71% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 69%
Generic Flash Disk 64GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 48GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 18.6 Mixed 10.7 15% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 17% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 30%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB 2,890 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 19GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 15 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 17 Mixed 21.5 SusWrite 14.9 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.4 169% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 2x2GB 266 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.4% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 10.8 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 6.3 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
40%	15%	80	35	20	60	40"	1920 1080	SAM051B SAMSUNG

History: Score 7: 1R 0G 2B | Score 40: 5R 4G 3B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16