PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C52 |
Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds) |
Memory | 6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 22 '21 at 16:06 |
Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
54.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.5%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown GD2.1127WC.004 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
78.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 75 | 23.9" | 1280 720 | SAM707D LF24T35 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 436x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 322x |
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 300x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 220x |
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples | 199x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 164x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $298 |