PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 25.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131001 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 22 '21 at 14:47 |
Run Duration | 223 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7870-$203
Asus(1043 0432) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 278 210 261 264 217 MB/s
|
75.3%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107
606GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 303 349 367 358 379 MB/s
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Hitachi HDS5C3030BLE630 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 144 140 143 142 MB/s
|
47%
Average
|
|||
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
464GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
|
32.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 865x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 645x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 438x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 160x |
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |