Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181015
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 07:48
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Memory 32.8
1-Core 35
2-Core 41
24% 36.3 Pts
4-Core 56.2
8-Core 74.2
8% 65.2 Pts
64-Core 52.4
3% 52.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
ASRock(1849 1315) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.4
3% 5.07 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6.3
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 47 75 31 42 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.2% Poor
Read 84.7
Write 73.2
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 62
15% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 3.3
42% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 51
DQ Mixed 65
58% 89.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB-$76
72GB free
Firmware: SB2OC7KP
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 1.5
Mixed 12.9
6% 7.2 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
2,323% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 25%
Seagate BUP Slim 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 28 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 9.9
Write 12.9
Mixed 9.1
SusWrite 27.3
11% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 70%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.2 7.5 8.8 7.5 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
4.73% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 5
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 8
12% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
16% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.73%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PBA 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 6.1
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 0.6
8% 2.93 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0D2D C24F390
Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 543 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback