Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Aspire TC-780 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory	6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171206
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '21 at 04:09
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.8% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 207 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 378 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 368 23% 368 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% EVGA(3842 2060) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.2% Very good	Lighting 93.9 Reflection 149 Parallax 101 76% 115 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 93.1 Splatting 86 82% 102 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 80GB free Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 187 79 80 56 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.5% Average	Read 484 Write 409 Mixed 390 SusWrite 118 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 1.2 51% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 36.8 68% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 207GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 92 96 109 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 143 Write 163 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 94.8 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 12GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 17.2 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	50%	2	107	5	144	23.8"	1280 720	HPN36DA HP X24ih

History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	866x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	232x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	191x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	328x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	174x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	161x

SSD
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	38x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	32x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	32x

RAM
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	87x
AM2P24HC4U1-B9QS AM2P24HC8T1-BUSS 12GBAdataBench 56%, 513 samples	69x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 7,235 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16