Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	23 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210320
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '21 at 03:49
Run Duration	410 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 81.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 278 90% 166 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 845 83% 678 Pts	64-Core 1,016 63% 1,016 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.1 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.5% Average	Lighting 56.9 Reflection 56.5 Parallax 74 46% 62.5 fps	MRender 62.5 Gravity 60.4 Splatting 42.7 44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 894 414 192 169 169 181 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	208% Outstanding	Read 1,583 Write 1,603 Mixed 1,250 SusWrite 336 267% 1,193 MB/s	4K Read 51 4K Write 173 4K Mixed 74.4 264% 99.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,081 DQ Write 814 DQ Mixed 944 707% 946 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 208% Great: 237%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 189GB free Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 413 415 405 419 420 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 408 Mixed 370 SusWrite 412 95% 422 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 27.6 125% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 42.5 71% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 100%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68 97,624 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 284GB free Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 919 431 432 432 432 433 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 1,547 Write 1712 Mixed 1,321 SusWrite 513 286% 1,273 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 74.8 258% 96 MB/s	DQ Read 1,145 DQ Write 978 DQ Mixed 1,001 766% 1,041 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 237%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 6GB free Firmware: CC98 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 61 59 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 88.7 Write 90.2 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 62.9 56% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 130 131 131 132 131 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 150 Mixed 74.8 SusWrite 128 99% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 114%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 668GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 107 109 110 110 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 67.4 Write 67.3 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 108 54% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 71%
External USB3.0 160GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 149GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 84 83 81 83 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 83.6 Write 79.4 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 82.6 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 44%
Generic External 250GB 627 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 202GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 37.2 Mixed 25.1 SusWrite 21 40% 30 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 34%
WD 1600BEV External 160GB 420 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 29GB free, PID 0704 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 33.9 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 29.1 40% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 20%
WD My Book 500GB 3,986 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 75GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 35.3 Write 35.6 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 20.6 38% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 1,935 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 38.2 96% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 27.1 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 37.2 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 4R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	16%	31	279	154	60	40"	1536 864	SAM0C39 SAMSUNG

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 21: 4R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,642x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $153Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,410x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,467x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $932

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16