Acer Predator G9-592

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G9-592  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Mustang_SLS
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160301
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 02:49
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 152
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 510
49% 405 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 107E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 0.2
5% 4.43 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 236 255 250 252 250 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 379
Write 374
Mixed 232
SusWrite 252
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 26.6
94% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 204
169% 245 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 92%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 126 130 130 129 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 105
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 128
70% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
11GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 4.4 4.9 4.8 4.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.3
SusWrite 4.7
13% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.2
120% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 22
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 21.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD04D5
Typical Predator G9-592 Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G9-592

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback