Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '21 at 02:37
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 76.7
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 138
60% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 497
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 496
33% 496 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 61%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 14.1
13% 15.9 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 9.9
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 13%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 360 23 19 374 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 454
Write 371
Mixed 172
SusWrite 196
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 20
76% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 37.4
72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 101%
Kingston A400 240GB-$29
31GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 56 34 80 59 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 291
Write 151
Mixed 135
SusWrite 52.9
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 15.9
62% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 34.7
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 36.6
28% 38.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 149 150 149 148 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 161
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 149
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
733GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 169 170 169 166 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 154
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 167
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
WD 15EADS External 1.5TB
677GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 30 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 28
Write 26.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 28.9
37% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.4% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 40: 6R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
40% 21% 47 67 53 60 32" 2560 1440 SPT0CC6 Sceptre Q32
Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 3,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $869
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback