| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VG3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130711 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 21 '21 at 18:57 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
43.6%
Average
|
54% 91.3 Pts
|
21% 155 Pts
|
10% 160 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2857
|
1.29%
Terrible
|
1% 1.27 fps
|
2% 1.97 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 97 97 80 101 113 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
25% 111 MB/s
|
26% 9.6 MB/s
|
78% 107 MB/s
|
|
WDC WD20EZAZ-00G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 164 159 173 182 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
33% 147 MB/s
|
11% 4.33 MB/s
|
2% 4.47 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
96GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 90 86 93 97 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
55% 74.6 MB/s
|
137% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
36.6%
Below average
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
34% 11.7 GB/s
|
32% 126 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,069 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples | 107x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 93x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 90x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 209x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 63x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 49x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $83 |