Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive	312% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO (all builds)
Memory	49.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210414
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 08:38
Run Duration	3169 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$412 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 160 2-Core 304 102% 186 Pts	4-Core 613 8-Core 1,033 100% 823 Pts	64-Core 1,607 100% 1,607 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 470GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 455 454 458 456 463 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 428 Mixed 367 SusWrite 456 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 34.7 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 48 164% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 356 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249 18,356 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1478 1495 1493 1469 1147 1056 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	312% Outstanding	Read 2,561 Write 1,754 Mixed 980 SusWrite 1,356 370% 1,663 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 73.1 254% 93.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,117 DQ Write 1,070 DQ Mixed 1,043 797% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 168% ↑ This bench: 312% Great: 363%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 167 154 163 160 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 114 Write 120 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 161 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.3 227% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 97%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 5.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 107 107 106 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 123 Write 109 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 105 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 100%
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$240 1,221 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 7.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 233 228 235 224 227 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 230 Write 240 Mixed 104 SusWrite 230 147% 201 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.2 296% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 138%
WD WD121PURZ-85GUCY0 12TB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 7.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 142 143 147 142 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 174 Mixed 98.8 SusWrite 144 109% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 2 401% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 138%
Hitachi HUH 721010ALE600 10TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 3TB free Firmware: LHGN SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 192 192 188 182 192 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 178 Mixed 118 SusWrite 190 121% 164 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.2 341% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUH 721010ALE600 10TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 3TB free Firmware: LHGN SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 120 116 110 122 127 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 190 Write 198 Mixed 109 SusWrite 120 114% 155 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.2 334% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 133%
Huh72101 0ALE601 10TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 2.5TB free Firmware: LHGL SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 183 183 180 168 178 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 92 Write 175 Mixed 120 SusWrite 179 105% 141 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 1.4 374% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 129%
Huh72101 0ALE601 10TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 2.5TB free Firmware: LHGL SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 169 173 178 166 164 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 114 Write 200 Mixed 117 SusWrite 168 111% 150 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.9 309% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 129%
ST16000N M003G-2KH113 16TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 6TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 58 59 60 58 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	92% Outstanding	Read 215 Write 198 Mixed 204 SusWrite 57.6 221% 169 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 1.4 625% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 3.8 DQ Write 8.3 DQ Mixed 1 330% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 92%
ST16000N M003G-2KH113 16TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 6TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 58 59 60 58 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.6% Outstanding	Read 210 Write 200 Mixed 200 SusWrite 57.8 219% 167 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 1.4 610% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 3.8 DQ Write 8 DQ Mixed 0.9 317% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 92%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 72GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 98 97 98 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 89.8 Write 75.1 Mixed 78.4 SusWrite 97.3 116% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 02FAEX-007BA0 2TB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 74GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 114 117 116 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 123 Write 123 Mixed 100 SusWrite 113 156% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 124% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 4x16GB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 44.1 MC Mixed 33.4 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 49.7 SC Mixed 32.1 93% 32.6 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 18: 1R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
18%	9%	109	95	55	120	0"	1920 1080

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	2,383x
Core i9-9900KIntel $412Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	298x
Core i7-8086KIntel $399Bench 91%, 38,086 samples	250x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	686x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	336x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	229x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	199x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	182x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	145x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	115x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	112x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $1,129

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16