Gigabyte GA-880GMA-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-880GMA-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110307
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 07:20
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150 5,147 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	49% Average	Memory 68.9 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 86.5 42% 65.3 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 170 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 7260) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 21.5 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 26.9 18% 27.7 fps	MRender 21.7 Gravity 23.8 Splatting 22.5 19% 22.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$37 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 97 97 111 105 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 302 Write 255 Mixed 163 SusWrite 115 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 9.3 32% 9.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.4 DQ Write 19.8 DQ Mixed 17.7 14% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 513GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 125 126 126 127 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 98.8 Write 129 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 127 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.9% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 7.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5.1 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 42: 4R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
42%	60%	30	117	62	70	21.7"	1920 1080	SAM0737 SM2333T

History: Score 26: 4R 2G 0B | Score 42: 4R 4G 10B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-880GMA-USB3 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-880GMA-USB3

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	7x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	5x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 5,806 samples	3x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	4x
P3-128 128GBBench 63%, 3,189 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	8x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	8x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $135

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16