Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200811
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '21 at 01:28
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$101 93,718 User benchmarks, average bench 68% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 120 2-Core 226 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 660 65% 533 Pts	64-Core 651 40% 651 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 8753) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.7% Very good	Lighting 89.4 Reflection 120 Parallax 81.5 73% 96.9 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 80.1 Splatting 72.4 69% 86.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X2001T 1TB 11,283 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 140GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1230A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 63 19 2.1 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 432 Write 172 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 51.2 36% 166 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 9.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 105%
Team T253E2001T 1TB 971 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 942GB free Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 360 377 374 376 374 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 486 Write 385 Mixed 383 SusWrite 374 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 28.6 119% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 49.7 71% 131 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 99,207 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	MC Read 34.7 MC Write 33.9 MC Mixed 33 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.7 SC Write 38.8 SC Mixed 27.8 87% 30.4 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 56: 7R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
56%	32%	63	106	7	144	23.8"	1920 1080	AOC2490 G2490W1G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4S Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 126%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 119%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	79x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	64x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	34x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	32x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $854Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $640

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16