Packard imedia S3720

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Packard imedia S3720 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard MCP73PV
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090924
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '21 at 23:17
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109 39,897 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Intel, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Memory 76.4 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 77.1 44% 64.9 Pts	4-Core 77.3 8-Core 76.9 10% 77.1 Pts	64-Core 67.7 4% 67.7 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315 2,008 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B 1141) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.1 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1 Splatting 2.1 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 93 94 91 96 98 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.8% Poor	Read 65.5 Write 87.6 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 92.7 16% 73 MB/s	4K Read 8.2 4K Write 15.8 4K Mixed 13.2 38% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 36.4 DQ Write 73.1 DQ Mixed 46.3 38% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 124%
Intel SSDSA2CT040G3 40GB 1,759 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 29GB free Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 46 46 45 46 47 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 163 Write 46.7 Mixed 61.5 SusWrite 45.5 17% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 6 41% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 23.2 DQ Write 36.8 DQ Mixed 20.6 18% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT2GT64U8HD0BY-AD 2x2GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 2.4 8% 2.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 3 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	2%	55	21	15	60	32"	1474 829	ONK0A33 HT-R380

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 1: 0R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical imedia S3720 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3720

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	9x
Pentium E5400Intel $75Bench 36%, 14,795 samples	6x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	6x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	3x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	2x
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	1x

RAM
GU342G0ALEPR692C6F GU342G0ALEPR692C6F 4GBUnknownBench 12%, 167 samples	10x
NT2GT64U8HD0BY-AD 2x2GBNanyaBench 14%, 164 samples	6x
Micron 16HTF25664AZ-800H1 4GBKingstonBench 11%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16