Packard imedia S3800

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Packard imedia S3800 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard FIH57
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '21 at 22:30
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 880 808 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	66% Good	Memory 88 1-Core 67.2 2-Core 132 60% 95.6 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 392 39% 316 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.4 Reflection 18.7 Parallax 18.8 15% 18.6 fps	MRender 15.9 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 16.9 14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 219 215 218 215 206 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.4% Good	Read 244 Write 232 Mixed 231 SusWrite 209 52% 229 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 35.4 115% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 124%
Compact Flash Card 0GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 2% 0GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Read 4 Write 1.3 Mixed 2 SusWrite 1.5 3% 2.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 1,443 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 11.8 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 11 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	57.8"	1280 701	PHL0000 Philips FTV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical imedia S3800 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3800

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	47x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	12x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	6x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	3x
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBHitachiBench 30%, 135 samples	7x
JM1333KLU-2G 2x2GBTranscendBench 39%, 308 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBToshibaBench 29%, 236 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16