Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	67.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer OL510
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	6.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '21 at 22:08
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 146 2-Core 275 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 489 8-Core 695 74% 592 Pts	64-Core 824 51% 824 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1A58 200D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7141 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.4% Good	Lighting 85.2 Reflection 94 Parallax 77.2 69% 85.5 fps	MRender 89.4 Gravity 76.2 Splatting 70.6 64% 78.7 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 89 78 78 75 78 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 653 Write 146 Mixed 215 SusWrite 87 60% 275 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 37.5 160% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 165 128% 178 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 169%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 23.3 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 35.5 SC Mixed 26.2 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 73: 10R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
73%	21%	100	292	203	120	15.5"	1920 1080	BOE08FB

History: Score 39: 5R 2G 8B | Score 61: 5R 9G 9B | Score 73: 10R 6G 5B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	453x
Core i7-4770KIntelBench 88%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	245x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	210x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	82x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GBSamsungBench 118%, 136 samples	63x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 261 samples	204x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	181x
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GBKingstonBench 88%, 1,552 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16