Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR (all builds)
Memory	29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190523
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '21 at 18:21
Run Duration	357 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$280 32,736 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 89.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 924 82% 695 Pts	64-Core 924 57% 924 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Gigabyte(1458 2311) CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.8% Above average	Lighting 69.1 Reflection 69.1 Parallax 94.6 56% 77.6 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 73.3 Splatting 52.7 52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 62%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 421GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2087 803 795 805 806 805 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	272% Outstanding	Read 1,837 Write 1,671 Mixed 1,347 SusWrite 1,017 329% 1,468 MB/s	4K Read 61.8 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 83 270% 92.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,286 DQ Write 1072 DQ Mixed 1,169 878% 1,176 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 272% Great: 355%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESEK.M8FE 4x8GB 329 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 25.7 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 34.7 SC Mixed 24.8 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 118%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 35: 4R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
35%	10%	133	320	240	60	18.5"	1366 768	GSM5ACB LG HD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	640x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	139x
Core i5-9600KFIntel $180Bench 93%, 65,122 samples	138x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	165x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	116x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	113x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	159x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	111x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	68x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	119x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	66x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $529

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16