PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200514 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 19 '21 at 17:29 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G4930
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
54.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.7.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 175 176 136 135 145 MB/s
|
64.3%
Good
|
|||
SRT USB 32GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 16 13 16 15 MB/s
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C16 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 566x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 262x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 238x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 172x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 152x |
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 148x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $569 |