MSI MS-16Q4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GS65 Stealth 9SE
MotherboardMSI MS-16Q4  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191007
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJul 18 '21 at 16:42
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 181
79% 132 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 618
60% 495 Pts
64-Core 688
42% 688 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1274) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.7% Very good
Lighting 86.1
Reflection 94.2
Parallax 86.3
70% 88.9 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 78.2
75% 93.6 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1234
Write 1,550
Mixed 1,018
284% 1,268 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 54.5
4K Mixed 50.3
173% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 96.9
DQ Mixed 199
229% 419 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
37GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 342 339 347 340 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 380
Write 268
Mixed 338
SusWrite 345
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 31.5
4K Mixed 23.2
77% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 104
75% 96.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 99%
WD easystore 2624 4TB
2TB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 106 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 117
Write 105
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 106
133% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
167% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 23.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 59: 7R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
59% 13% 149 106 6 240 15.5" 1920 1080 SHP14C5 LQ156M1JW03
History: Score 38: 6R 1G 5B | Score 66: 9R 4G 9B | Score 59: 7R 6G 6B
Typical MS-16Q4 Builds (Compare 1,778 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16Q4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback