Asrock G31M-S.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock G31M-S. (all builds)
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120516
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 18 '21 at 06:51
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47 4,697 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 39 33% 43.8 Pts	4-Core 38.7 8-Core 38.4 5% 38.6 Pts	64-Core 39.9 2% 39.9 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS120G2G0A- 120GB 5,294 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 87 86 83 83 81 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 227 Write 165 Mixed 118 SusWrite 98.9 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 13.9 2,298% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 153%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43 2,329 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 54GB free Firmware: 8.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 34 36 38 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	Read 38.6 Write 9.8 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 35.3 18% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 30%
WD WD400BB-60DGA0 40GB 739 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 26GB free Firmware: 05.01C05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 35 35 36 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 45.8 Write 45.4 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 35.2 29% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 31%
ITE Disk Array 1 40GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 36GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 7.3 7.7 6.9 8.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.8% Very poor	Read 56 Write 36.8 Mixed 34.4 SusWrite 8.9 25% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 19%
ITE Disk Array 3 10GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 2GB free Firmware: 3.02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 7.3 7.7 7 8.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.56% Terrible	Read 13.8 Write 13.8 Mixed 12 SusWrite 8.8 9% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.56% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.03 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 97.7 41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G31M-S. Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G31M-S.

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	10x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	7x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	9x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	66x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	12x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16