Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 20:27
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 80%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$155
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 596
58% 474 Pts
64-Core 685
42% 685 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 133
Parallax 154
123% 146 fps
MRender 156
Gravity 135
Splatting 100
103% 130 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 113%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
238GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 316 324 313 319 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70% Good
Read 378
Write 324
Mixed 304
SusWrite 315
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 25.3
90% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 155
122% 169 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70%
Great: 97%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
601GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 343 367 332 351 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 436
Write 372
Mixed 354
SusWrite 346
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 30.9
103% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 188
144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 125%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
627GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1681 1715 1694 1694 1729 1727 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,719
Write 1,719
Mixed 1,590
SusWrite 1,707
380% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 51.7
168% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 676
503% 667 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 255%
Great: 488%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
670GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 153 153 152 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 147
Mixed 95.2
SusWrite 152
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 30.6
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 24.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 6 4 165 27" 1280 720 DEL41D9 DELL S2721DGF
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $929
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback