Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
5 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer OL510
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 225
87% 148 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 536
60% 459 Pts
64-Core 616
41% 616 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Device(1A58 200D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5241
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (58 fps cap detected)
46.9% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 58
Parallax 58
47% 58 fps
MRender 58
Gravity 58
Splatting 58
47% 58 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 414 182 180 184 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,321
Write 964
Mixed 960
SusWrite 329
199% 894 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 59.3
204% 72.9 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 582
DQ Mixed 572
420% 545 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 160%
Great: 167%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
113GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 39 33 34 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 128
Write 30.5
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 39.9
66% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 24.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 61.6
65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 13: 0R 0G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 16% 82 64 51 120 15.5" 1536 864 BOE08FB
History: Score 11: 0R 0G 11B | Score 13: 0R 0G 13B
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback