Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer OL510
Memory	5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201013
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 129 2-Core 237 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 563 59% 473 Pts	64-Core 662 41% 662 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Device(1A58 200D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5241 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (58 fps cap detected)	47.3% Average	Lighting 58 Reflection 58 Parallax 58 47% 58 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 58 Splatting 58 48% 58 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB 7,359 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 414 182 180 184 179 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,321 Write 964 Mixed 960 SusWrite 329 199% 894 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 59.3 204% 72.9 MB/s	DQ Read 481 DQ Write 582 DQ Mixed 572 420% 545 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 169%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 113GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 39 33 34 32 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 128 Write 30.5 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 39.9 66% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	83.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 32.3 MC Mixed 24.1 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 24.8 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.9% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 13: 0R 0G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
13%	16%	82	64	51	120	15.5"	1536 864	BOE08FB

History: Score 11: 0R 0G 11B | Score 13: 0R 0G 13B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020) Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Late 2020)

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	454x
Core i7-4770KIntelBench 88%, 3 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	246x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	210x

SSD
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	82x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00A00 256GBSamsungBench 118%, 136 samples	63x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	30x

RAM
AO1P32NC8T1-BCIS 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 261 samples	204x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	181x
HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GBKingstonBench 88%, 1,552 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16