Asrock H310M-HDV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H310M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 10:43
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 464
61% 458 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
EVGA(3842 1580) 1.5GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 30.8
21% 34.5 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 29.6
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 94 22 22 21 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 399
Write 49.1
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 52.6
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 22
90% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 32
DQ Mixed 54.4
78% 154 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
98GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 46.2
Write 47.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 49.3
32% 43.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
64GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 18 17 18 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 86.4
Write 20.7
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 17.6
40% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.3
122% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 30 49.5" 1280 701 ONK0E33 HT-R393
Typical H310M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback