Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PM
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210525
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 17 '21 at 10:41
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 160
2-Core 265
91% 167 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 720
75% 601 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 16E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.6
Reflection 113
Parallax 26.7
18% 54.1 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 16.1
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 20%
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 16E2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.35
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 113
Parallax 104
88% 108 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 87.1
Splatting 79.7
78% 98.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1304 1576 1433 241 369 364 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,551
Write 1,469
Mixed 1,363
SusWrite 881
296% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 74
253% 91.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,368
DQ Write 1,160
DQ Mixed 1,143
889% 1,224 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 250%
Great: 236%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
23GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 26 28 28 26 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 147
Write 34.9
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 26.8
72% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 10
692% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 13
DQ Mixed 8.4
781% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 13.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM Builds (Compare 5,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PM_FX516PM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback