Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 01:21
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 209
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 574
59% 477 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
159% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 209
Parallax 257
174% 226 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 216
Splatting 166
172% 217 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 159%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 312 362 362 364 355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 429
Mixed 387
SusWrite 333
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 43.3
138% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 304
246% 348 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 125%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
25GB free
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 94 93 93 95 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
47% Average
Read 152
Write 117
Mixed 133
SusWrite 91.2
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 72.2
4K Mixed 22
98% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 110
87% 122 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47%
Great: 61%
Colorful SL500 320GB
253GB free
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 298 342 344 344 344 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 2.5TB (2011)-$80
170GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 94 95 94 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 121
Write 106
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 92.8
73% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 72%
JMicron Generic 4TB
50GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 165 171 173 175 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 188
Write 185
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 169
206% 156 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
181% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 84%
BUFFALO HD-HXU3 2TB
501GB free, PID 0180
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 80 85 88 87 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 89.3
Write 91.6
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 82.1
109% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
57% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.5% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 54.9
73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0657 SyncMaster
Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback