Razer Blade

Performance Results

Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 71%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 117
2-Core 229
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 584
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 730
49% 730 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 6.2
4% 25.7 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9
5% 7.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV8-8E128 128GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C270902
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 171 142 141 135 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 347
Write 384
Mixed 372
SusWrite 153
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 45.3
151% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 114
133% 228 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 93%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
488GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 81 83 79 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 47.4
Write 95.2
Mixed 72
SusWrite 79.4
55% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.7
171% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.1
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 62: 8R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
62% 65% 34 298 214 60 0" 1920 1080 BOE0747
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 6,366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 75%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback