Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '21 at 15:16
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 41.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 207 62% 119 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 547 52% 432 Pts	64-Core 459 28% 459 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics 115,953 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Lighting 13.3 Reflection 61.8 Parallax 19.3 11% 31.5 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 16 Splatting 13 10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 26,870 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80001C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 58 56 58 56 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 578 Write 137 Mixed 121 SusWrite 62.2 48% 225 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 32 128% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 490 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 182 168% 268 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 215GB free Firmware: SDM4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 82 82 90 77 81 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 75.6 Write 119 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 83.5 60% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0 100% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB 48,644 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.9% Below average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.9 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 13.5 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	18%	38	159	3	60	15.5"	1536 864	NCP002D

History: Score 19: 2R 3G 0B | Score 19: 2R 2G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,835x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	978x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,359x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	946x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	507x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,156x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	404x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	587x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	376x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	135x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16