Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210623
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '21 at 14:48
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 84.9
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 864
80% 670 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 169
Reflection 170
Parallax 169
138% 169 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 155
Splatting 128
126% 158 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 175 172 170 151 156 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 480
Write 390
Mixed 404
SusWrite 191
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 36.3
118% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 137
108% 151 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 124%
JD 480GB 480GB
32GB free
Firmware: JD20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 145 6.5 13 7.6 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 490
Write 396
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 61.1
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 9.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 111%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 10 9.7 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 19.9
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 11.2
27% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.5
197% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 34.5
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 39
SC Mixed 30.3
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 52: 5R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
52% 45% 44 106 6 144 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
History: Score 31: 2R 4G 9B | Score 52: 5R 6G 9B
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $602
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback