Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battleship	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1200x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180627
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '21 at 13:08
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 175 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 494 52% 414 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.6% Outstanding	Lighting 114 Reflection 129 Parallax 111 93% 118 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 122 Splatting 112 94% 115 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-00000 256GB 835 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 68 69 67 69 71 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 260 Write 198 Mixed 242 SusWrite 95.3 45% 199 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 32.7 107% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 162 122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 124%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 52GB free Firmware: 0102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 52 107 74 8.9 112 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 495 Write 446 Mixed 412 SusWrite 129 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 27.8 120% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 1.3 81% 194 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 102%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 132GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 60 60 59 60 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 69.7 Write 46.8 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 59 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 107% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 50GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 74 75 74 74 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 140 Write 135 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 74.2 115% 92.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GB 1,683 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 18.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 25: 5R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
25%	25%	20	331	263	60	24.1"	1920 1200	ENC1996 S2402W

History: Score 11: 1R 1G 3B | Score 25: 5R 0G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	71x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	15x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	11x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
HG5d Q Series 256GBToshiba $225Bench 82%, 3,223 samples	4x
840 250GBSamsungBench 77%, 2,100 samples	4x

RAM
M393B5170EH1- 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 40 samples	9x
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A 4x4GBHynixBench 89%, 39 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16